Main | Bundaberg push for Australia’s first men’s refuge »

Recent Australian intimate partner violence research finds high rates of male victimisation

Recent Australian research by Ahmadabadi et al in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence has found that males more often remain in an abusive relationship and report experiencing higher rates of intimate partner violence in their current relationships compared with females. The paper, Gender Differences in Intimate Partner Violence in Current and Prior Relationships, adds to the growing research literature supporting a gender symmetry model of family violence.


Although much available research indicates that intimate partner violence (IPV) is male perpetrated, growing recent evidence suggests a gender symmetry model of family violence. This article examines gender differences in IPV in current and prior relationships reported by young adults. Data comprised 2,060 young adults (62.1% females) who participated in the 30- year follow-up of the Mater Hospital and University of Queensland Study of Pregnancy (MUSP) in Brisbane, Australia. The Composite Abuse Scale was used to measure IPV during the last 12 months in the respondents’ most recent relationship. Similar proportions of males and females reported leaving their prior relationships. Both males and females who were not currently in a relationship reported experiencing much higher rates of IPV than those who were in a relationship. There were no differences in the past experience of IPV between males and females who were not currently in a relationship, but males in a current relationship reported they experienced most forms of IPV more often than did females. IPV typically involves both male and female perpetrators and victims. It does appear that the majority of relationships involving higher rates of IPV were dissolved. IPV was more likely to have occurred in relationships that ended than in relationships that persisted. Males more often remain in an abusive relationship and report experiencing higher rates of IPV in their current relationships compared with females.

You can access the full study here.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (1)

One of the puzzling contradictions of the modern feminist movement is that they have a history of supporting male LGBT rights over the past 50 years on the basis (justifiably) that, like many women, these men are vulnerable victims of society. At the same time, even in the face of strong evidence of its prevalence, feminism has been overtly indifferent towards male victims of domestic violence who are clearly also victims of society and are vulnerable human beings needing help and support.

There is something very sinister about this cold disregard for the humanity of weaker, more vulnerable men. It suggests there is no real heart in the modern feminist movement. It looks too much like it is driven by a need for one’s group to be attributed the status of superiority and to then enjoy the automatic right to control the other group. The same features one sees in the caste systems, racism and classism (ie breeding).

It seems we are watching history repeat itself through clever manipulation. Recent political events suggest that, also, even Australia’s male leaders have no interest in social policy that helps vulnerable male human beings. There is going to be no new social policy that supports male human beings. The question is then, What can be done to convince fair minded people in society that this prejudice exists and is dehumanizing?

June 11, 2019 | Unregistered CommenterFactsseeker

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>