« Open letter to the Leader of the Opposition, Mr Bill Shorten | Main | ABC TV Q&A Family Violence Special - Question from Male Victim »
Wednesday
Feb252015

Q&A domestic violence program ignored male victims | brisbanetimes.com.au

1424821691965.jpg

The debate about domestic violence has descended morality play in which roles are assigned according to gender, writes Bill O'Chee.

While the increased awareness of domestic violence issues is to be welcomed, its manipulation by those with other agendas is an entirely different matter.  

Monday night's Q&A programme on the ABC was a case in point. Not only did it work hard on perpetuating stereotypes about domestic violence, but the producers also refused to accept a potential panelist because she was a woman. 

I have seen emails which show the producers had originally invited on the panel a man from 1in3, a group working to raise the profile of male victims of domestic violence. He was unable to go on, but well known psychologist and author on men's health, Dr Elizabeth Celi, was suggested instead. The producers rejected her because she was a woman.  

More precisely, they rejected her because she was an eloquent and insightful woman who wanted to speak up for men and children who were the victims of domestic violence. You see, the problem was she didn't fit the stereotype.

Yet there was a place on the panel for my old chum, Natasha Stott Despoja, the Ambassador for Women and Girls.  That's because her perspective on domestic violence is finely attuned to exactly those stereotypes.

The sad fact is that much of the "debate" about domestic violence is not a debate at all. It has descended into a 21st century morality play in which roles are assigned according to gender. Men can have only two roles in this play: they are either the brutish perpetrators of domestic violence, or the courageous men who care for women.

The voices that are drowned out are the men who are the victims of domestic violence - about one in three of all cases - and the children. Australian Institute of Criminology Statistics show that 45 per cent of children murdered by a parent are murdered by the mother, making this kind of domestic violence an equal opportunity killer.

While domestic violence by men against women features large, not once has Ms Stott Despoja mentioned violence against children by women. Why is that? Because it would require admitting women are just as capable of acts of violence as men.

And while one woman dies on average each week as a result of domestic violence, men are not far behind; for them it is one on average every ten days.

As for Monday night's Q&A programme, it was a highly scripted version of the domestic violence morality play. Every questioner and every question was chosen in the advance by the producers. The message the producers wanted to give was that domestic violence is all about violence by men against women and little else, a message both simple and incorrect in equal measures.

It was only at the close of the programme that a man was allowed to ask a question about the domestic violence he had suffered at the hands of his wife, and then it was quickly dismissed.  

The humiliation of the victim was completed by Natasha Stott Despoja talking about violence against men in heterosexual relationships and proclaiming domestic violence was still "a gender issue".

It was sad the Q&A producers stooped to this.

Since I last wrote on this subject, I have heard from many women who support male victims of domestic violence. They have seen in their sons, brothers and partners that victims of domestic violence suffer equally, irrespective of gender.

The discussion about domestic violence should and must be conditioned by love and compassion for the victims, not politics and prejudice.

400 years ago, Shakespeare wrote of another form of prejudice in The Merchant of Venice: "If you prick us, do we not bleed?… If you poison us, do we not die?"

Surely this should guide our concern for all victims of domestic violence, not just some.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (3)

For a show that was billed to be a discussion of 'Family' violence, it quickly became focused as a 'Violence against women' discussion. However, I'm not surprised at all. When I heard a day before the show that Dr Celi had been rejected as a panelist, and Natasha Spot Destroyer was included, I knew it was going to be a feminist man bash session. If only I were a betting person, I could have made a buck or two on the side as the show progressed exactly as I'd foretold myself it would.

Spot Destroyer's dismissal of the man in the audience was mean spirited and demeaning to him, yet not at all surprising when watching the cognitive dissonance on her face as the poor bloke was explaining his situation and asking his question. She knew he deserved a compassionate response but her ideological bigotry reigned in any empathy as she responded with her insistence on 'reminding' everyone that this is a 'gender issue'.
Her response was disgusting.

February 25, 2015 | Unregistered CommenterWhoTheHellCares

Hi Bill, could you add the references for the stats you quote, please, keen to know more

February 25, 2015 | Unregistered CommenterPaul

All behaviour is gender neutral.

Darcy Freeman is righty being punished for throwing his 5 yr. old daughter to her death from the Gateway Bridge, in Melbourne.

A woman did the same thing to her 2 yr. old son from the same bridge a year earlier. Hardly rated a mention in the press. The difference? - she was a woman, and she went over the bridge with her son. She was no less guilty of murder.

Statistics prove time and again that children are safest with their biological father.

February 26, 2015 | Unregistered CommenterGeorge Goring

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>